The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that could overturn a decision on how much political parties can spend on ...

Mark Franke, M.B.A., an adjunct scholar of the Indiana Policy Review and its book reviewer, is formerly an associate ...

From birthright citizenship to tariffs, many of the president’s key policies run counter to the Constitution’s original ...

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard argument in a case that could upend how the federal government has been run for over a ...

WASHINGTON (AP) — Conservative Supreme Court justices on Tuesday appeared to back a Republican-led drive that would erase limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates ...

Deseret Voices will be released on Thursdays on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, the Deseret News YouTube channel and at ...

New presidents cannot come into office and fire existing officials just to install preferred leaders in their place. But that is exactly what Trump did.

The Supreme Court's undertaking is oriented toward originalism. This often overlaps with Republican partisan outcomes – it ...

Good faith and fair dealing—adherence to what we might call “norms”—is essential to the functioning of American government.

Simply put, the argument against the Trump administration is that the 14th Amendment’s expansion of citizenship after the ...

As I read U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s new book “Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and ...

Rather than assuming that anyone called to testify against a defendant in open court can do so truthfully and ...